WHY AMERICAN EDUCATION HAS DECLINED

Statistics Show American Education Has Declined.


Over the last century, American education has declined significantly despite spending per student by the federal, state, and local governments increasing dramatically which has contributed to the United States' current fall from the top of the world mountain.

While education spending has increased greatly from what it had been in the middle of the century, proficiency in core subjects has dropped as an abysmal eighteen percent of fourth graders are proficient in history, 30% are proficient in science, 30% are proficient in math, and just 31% are proficient in reading.

The decline in education appears to be worse as the grade level gets higher with average SAT scores dropping from over 540 in 1964 to below 510 today despite spending per student having risen from under $3,000 per year to more than $8,000 per year.

Other countries, even third world countries, are ahead of the United States in world rankings as in a survey of 21 countries that included everyone from Spain to Hungary to Jordan had the United States place fifteenth overall.

STUPID IN AMERICA

 

WHY AMERICAN EDUCATION HAS DECLINED: SPENDING

What the education decline shows is a sharp rise in government funding for education coinciding with a sharper drop in proficiency in the basic subjects.

A more recent study showed that around 2% percent of students are advanced in science, in the fourth grade, while around 20% are proficient while as many kids have a basic understanding of science as those who are below basic.

Around eighteen percent of fourth grade students are proficient in history with around thirty percent of students labeled as proficient in math and reading.

WHY AMERICAN EDUCATION HAS DECLINED: SAT SCORES

Once students are more advanced and are in the eleventh or twelfth grade, their progress despite increased government funding does not get any better.

In 1964, the average high schooler's SAT score was over 540 points with the government spending less than three thousand dollars annually per student.

In ten years, government spending neared five thousand dollars per student while SAT scores plummeted to around 505 points.

In 1980, government funding had hit over five thousand dollars per pupil while SAT scores dropped to their all time low at below 500 points.

By 1985, SAT score went up a little to 505 while government funding went up to six thousand dollars.

While government funding continues to rise to ten thousand dollars per student, SAT scores continue to hover around 510 points.

WHY AMERICAN EDUCATION HAS DECLINED: WORLD RANKINGS

In one survey of education in twenty-one different countries, the United States placed fifteenth, finishing behind China, England, Hungary, France, Israel, Italy, and Canada and tied with Spain. The only countries that the United States beat out in the rankings were Portugal, Jordan, Brazil, and Mozambique.

In another survey that ranked the International Student Math Assessment of fifteen year olds among thirty four nations, the United States placed twenty-ninth.

Finishing well ahead of the United States were China, Japan, Korea, Switzerland, Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, Canada, Austria, Poland, and Latvia.

The only nations to place behind the United States were Italy, Portugal, Greece, Mexco, and Turkey.

 

Truth-It
Article Discussion
Comments on: WHY AMERICAN EDUCATION HAS DECLINED...

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
sassiebrat | September 20, 2009 3:10pm
I was born in 1951. Talk about discipline, we did not talk in class, let alone run around the room like wild animals, spit on the teachers (it would have been the last thing we did), push each other, or a myriad of other behaviors I have seen in today's classrooms. And when/where did this discipline start? At birth! This means that mama was parenting us, (she was around to do this!). Today's parents (and I use this term sparingly) have NO CLUE how to raise their kids; and then when things go wrong, they blame the kid, the teachers, the schools, the government, society, their genes, their ancestors, not enough money; well, you get the picture. IT STARTS AT HOME! If you have a five-year-old coming into kindergarten thinking it's ok to spit on the teacher, hit, masturbate, you name it, how is the teacher supposed to correct this? Especially when IT IS NOT her job to correct it! AND she has been stripped of ANY disciplenary tools! And then we wonder why. And then we come up with all sorts of nonsense to correct/explain the problem.
sassiebrat
ardot | September 19, 2009 6:17pm
This article is less of a "why" and more of a "how", which in itself is merely a further demonstration of the low standard of education.
ardot
dieloreli | September 19, 2009 5:18pm
One thing they fail to tell you is most countries FILTER their students. The ones they test are only the ones who are going to college. The ones who are slated or tracked for blue collar training are not mixed with the "top" students. In the USA we are required to educate everyone from everywhere, regardless of language, economic, social, or intellectual ability in ONE classroom. HOW effective is that? If a child is behaviorally disordered, he is allowed to come to class just as every other child. If he disrupts the class repeatedly, that is okay because this is America and it would be wrong to put them in another classroom. IT IS OUR CULTURE. We feel everyone should be taught together and given all the same opportunities even if they are not ready for them. Because of this view,we prevent those who are ready from moving ahead. Let's get involved with schools and find OUT what is wrong and start from there. This arm chair approach is just more of the same. If you want to change education then FIND OUT WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE SCHOOLS!
dieloreli
zaphytaffy | September 18, 2009 6:12pm
I reluctantly agree with most of the contents of the TWO comments above (KnightMan seems to lack the discipline to wait for his comments to be posted ;)) having been educated in America; the use of the group liberals when talking about a country that was run by conservatives for 8 years; and god having anything to do with it. Putting my national pride, nitpicking on KnightMan and religious views aside I see myself falling into "it's the parents" catch-all answer. But that is wrong in part as well because there is not a single problem or answer to this. It is in part parents but we can broaden that to community. America as a community is far more concerned with physical and social attributes over mental. Television and fast food are symptoms, not causes. And if you believe in gods or a god, them/he/she/it gave us the ability to do for ourselves (or this is all supposed to happen). Teaching discipline and setting goals (whose success depends on results) at the earliest age possible not only by parents, grandparents (who tend to under-mind parents), neighbors and government officials are essential if future American generations are to lift the country to the next. So support your local parent or go out and teach a class (teaching a child how to study is 90% teaching discipline). Oh and stop things like this: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009873682_grades16m.html from happening.
zaphytaffy
Scott | September 18, 2009 5:57pm
  • Knightman is at the very least partially right: if you try to protect kids' self esteem instead of rewarding intelligence, guess what they will learn? They will learn how to feel ok with being stupid. It's amazing that people don't understand it: if you teach a kid to think he is always right, and not to be upset if he is wrong - THAT IS WHAT THEY WILL LEARN!
  • Shep - Other countries have television too, so that clearly is not the problem. The mere presence of a tv does not affect someones intelligence or learning ability. And fast food - eating doesn't make you dumb. There are plenty (less than in the general population, but there are some) of intelligent but overweight people. Now, substituting a kid's curiosity with these things could be a problem. But I know these things are not in themselves the issue - I watch TV and eat fast food but I am still in the top of my engineering university's class. Anyway, I have to wonder what this was supposed to mean: "(a)rithmatic -math to the dumb american kids" ????? Calling mathematics math makes you dumb? I call it math even though I know how to do Fourier transforms and the like. Maybe we should be more constructive than criticizing perfectly acceptable words - we could instead teach that nationalities are capitalized (American) and how to spell correctly (arithmetic).
  • Scott
    KnightMan | September 18, 2009 3:30pm
    Money is not the answer to improved education in the U.S. or anywhere else. It's called discipline. Something that our liberal education system cares nothing about. The emphasis is on rewarding effort and coddling their self-esteem rather than practicing and enforcing disciplined study habits and rewarding results.
    KnightMan
    KnightMan | September 18, 2009 3:28pm

    Money is not the answer to improved education in the U.S. or anywhere. It's called discipline. Something that our liberal education system knows nothing about. The emphasis is on the children's self-esteem and rewarding effort...rather than disciplined learning habits and rewarding the results.

    KnightMan
    KnightMan | September 18, 2009 3:25pm
    It isn't money that will improve education in the U.S. ....it is called discipline. Something that liberals know nothing about as they strive to push the agenda of worrying about self-esteem and rewarding effort instead of results.
    KnightMan
    KnightMan | September 18, 2009 3:21pm
    It isn't money that will improve education in the U.S....it is called discipline. Something that liberals have little use for as they strive to sell the idea of "self-esteem" and reward efforts rather than results.
    KnightMan
    Shep | September 18, 2009 2:20pm
    2 Simple reasons: 1. Television; the American child is raised on a diet of fast food and TV - don't really know which is more dangerous to their health. Fast food causes physical problems whilst the TV just makes them dumb. 2. The lack of world knowledge (world news to the average American means something from out of State) just compunds the basic lack in education. A return to the 3 R's of education (reading (w)riting and (a)rithmatic -math to the dumb american kids) may help, but not much. GOD help America (and the world cos they are bringing the rest of us down with them)
    Shep
    get your truth fix
    • JibJab eCards
    • CollegeWeekLive, the Free Virtual College Fair
    • Easy VHS to DVD for MAC - New!
    • Save up to 40% at your favorite stores.
    • Your Pictures As Posters. Overnight.
    • Visit GlobalGiving.com